Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2009 18:28:23 GMT -5
How does sheiko use the average intensity calculations to plan future training sessions for his athletes? I am trying to better understand how to puts his training sessions together.
|
|
|
Post by benburgess on Mar 19, 2009 18:46:43 GMT -5
Its relative intensity that is looked at: RI = (reps x %'age)/total reps. So for example if you were looking at the following work: 50% x 5, 60% x 2 x 3, 70% x 2 x 3, 80% x 3 x 2 the calc is: RI = (50x5 + 60x6 + 70x6 + 80x6) / (5+6+6+6) RI = 66% That would probably be a bit on the low side...most cycles seem to come in at an overall RI of about 69%. Damn I am sad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2009 19:33:16 GMT -5
So is the goal of the intensity zone to ensure your average weight each week is approximately 69-70%?
|
|
|
Post by benburgess on Mar 20, 2009 14:10:56 GMT -5
So is the goal of the intensity zone to ensure your average weight each week is approximately 69-70%? Kind of. As i understand it the soviet experiments have shown that for a prep cycle for a rated lifter, an overall cycle relative intensity of 67-69% is the most suitable for strength gain. As a lifters rating approaches CMS / MS an overall relative intesntiy of 69-71% builds strength better. As long as you pick the right cycle for your rating this stuff is all worked out for you, which is bullit.
|
|