|
Post by benburgess on Dec 19, 2008 11:30:46 GMT -5
Well call me a Borisnerd but i went through the online translation yesterday and tried to get a hold of what the big man reckons SPP is all about.
Here's the list:
SQUAT
SUPPLEMENTAL
Pause Sq Box Sq Fr Box Sq DE Sq Slow Sq Front Sq Wide Front Sq
DEVELOPMENTAL
Zercher Lunge Front Lunge Hack Lunge Duck Foot Sq Negative Sq Belt Sq Sq Lockouts Crouch Sq ? Sq with Chains Smith Machine Sq Leg Press Leg Extension Ham Curls Sq Jumps Depth Jumps Box Jumps Calf Raises Snatch Grip High Pulls Snatch Grip High Pulls from Boxes Seated High Pulls ? Hyperextensions/Weighted in various ways Seated GM
BENCH
SUPPLEMENTAL
Wide Grip High-touch Bench Medium Grip Bench Close Grip Bench Bench over Foam (arch) Flat Back Bench Slow Bench 3-5 sec Pause Bench Rvs Grip Bench DE Bench Negatives Lockouts Bench with Chains
DEVELOPMENTAL
Incline Bench (high touch) Decline Bench (low touch) Incline OHP OHP Behind-the-neck Press Push Press Seated OHP Seated Behind-the-neck Press Alternate DB OHP Standing Alternate DB OHP Seated DB Bench Nosebreakers Pec Deck Flyes Incline Flyes Weighted Dips Weighted Pushups Wide Grip Weighted Pushups Bench Dips Pushdowns Curls
DEADLIFT
SUPPLEMENTAL
Defecit DL Pulls to Knees Pause Pulls to Knees Pulls to Knees + finish Pulls to Knees + Mid Thigh (2 Stops) Pulls from Boxes + Slow Eccentric Pulls from Boxes (BTK) DL Lockouts Pulls from High Boxes (ATK) Snatch Grip Pulls from Boxes
DEVELOPMENTAL
Snatch Grip Pulls Pulls with Chains High Pulls Shrugs Belt Sqs Seated Pulls ? GM’s Stiff Leg GM’s Seated GM’s Hyperextensions/Weighted Hypers Roman Chair Situp Decline Situp Leg Raises
This aint gospel lads and lasses cos some of them words in the book come out of the translator right funny, but I reckon I worked out most of 'em. The ones with a ? are pure stabs in the dark though.
|
|
|
Post by benburgess on Dec 19, 2008 11:36:29 GMT -5
Here's a question for Dave or Eric about the supplemental/developmental thing...
The developmental movements are the ones that can be chosen to be used at the end of the workout, with lighter weights, right? This seems clear as they are prescribed often in the programs (e.g. GM's or lunges).
So when are the supplemental ones used? It seems that they are also in the programs, often in the 'main body' of work, e.g. pulls to knees, then full pulls. Is it the case that these supplemental SPP movements would be subbed in the programs to suit a lifters needs or weaknesses?
e.g. the program as written has a lifter doing full pulls, then bench, then pulls from blocks. Lets say a lifter is great at lockout but weak off the floor. Would defecit pulls be subbed for pulls from blocks (both supplemental SPP movements)??
|
|
|
Post by erictalmant on Dec 19, 2008 13:05:07 GMT -5
Ben:
I should be able to get to this thread either later tonight or sometime over the weekend.
Good questions!
|
|
|
Post by davebates on Dec 19, 2008 15:13:58 GMT -5
Here's a question for Dave or Eric about the supplemental/developmental thing... The developmental movements are the ones that can be chosen to be used at the end of the workout, with lighter weights, right? This seems clear as they are prescribed often in the programs (e.g. GM's or lunges). So when are the supplemental ones used? This is a great question, one which I do not have the answer for sure. Before you decide to change anything I would do the program as written at least twice. If you get the same results (no progress) The perhaps i would look into trying something different. This has been the case for me for sometime, so what I can tell you what I have been trying is, on the second round of either bench or squat I have been using a supplemental exercise The results seem promising, but I will not know for sure until I can repeat the results every time. The deadlift portion of the program I have left alone, I have not seen anyone who has not made progress the way it is written. It seems that they are also in the programs, often in the 'main body' of work, e.g. pulls to knees, then full pulls. Is it the case that these supplemental SPP movements would be subbed in the programs to suit a lifters needs or weaknesses? e.g. the program as written has a lifter doing full pulls, then bench, then pulls from blocks. Lets say a lifter is great at lockout but weak off the floor. Would defecit pulls be subbed for pulls from blocks (both supplemental SPP movements)?? All I can tell you is try it, let the readers know how it works for you. I would keep the competition exercises in the order as written as well as the percents used on the exercises.
|
|
|
Post by joeldibattista on Dec 19, 2008 18:31:52 GMT -5
Good stuff Benny mate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2008 4:35:46 GMT -5
Very helpful Ben - thanks and exalted.
|
|
|
Post by erictalmant on Dec 20, 2008 9:32:05 GMT -5
Classification of Exercises:
Competition Exercises Special Preparatory Exercises General Preparatory Exercises
The competition exercises are the actual exercises of the sport competition i.e. the squat, bench press, and the deadlift. The powerlifting competition exercises play an obvious important role in one’s training since without them it is impossible to fully provide the athlete with the specific requirements of the squat, bench press, and the deadlift.
Special preparatory exercises are made up of components and variations of the competition exercises. They are very similar in regards to the form and the character of the abilities displayed. Depending upon the primary emphasis of the SPP exercises, we can further categorize to supplementary and developmental.
Supplementary SPP exercises: Designed to help the athlete master the form of the movement. These exercises, depending upon their coordination demands, methods of training and amount and type of resistance improve and solidify the development of the necessary physical qualities and *should* greatly contribute to perfecting technical mastery. Since athletes lift heavy weights and work at great power, this group-along with the competition exercises-is the fundamental group in the powerlifter’s training.
Examples of Supplementary SPP Exercises: Can all be found in the Sheiko Book in each section i.e. squat, bench, deadlift.
Squat: box squats, front squats, squatting with tempo and form manipulations Bench: wide grip, board presses, close grip bench, tempo manipulations, etc. Deadlift: DL from deficit, to the knees, from blocks (rack lockouts), tempo manipulations
Developmental SPP exercises: Emphasize the development of physical qualities that contribute to the execution of the competition exercises. They can be done with barbells, machines, with kettle bells and other types of resistances (bands and chains). For the most part they have a local effect, are executed with smaller weights, and thus the power developed is comparatively small. Thus the training parameters need to be quite different than the competition exercises.
Developmental exercises also serve as additional means in physical preparation (GPP) but not limited to this role. They should always be executed with a large range of motion (and in all directions) in the joints to have a positive impact on the development of the tendons and ligaments-very important! The strength of tendons and ligaments increases slowly when compared to muscle which can affect speed-strength which can result in injury. That is why it is recommended to devote training time to strengthening the tendons and ligaments by doing voluminous work (comparatively) with low intensity.
In order to properly and accurately evaluate training the exercises in the first group (competition and supplementary) are counted as fundamental loading and the second group (developmental) is considered as additional. They are both calculated and analyzed separately.
General Preparatory Exercises: These are the most extensive and most diverse group of training “exercises”. This is where the powerlifter becomes athletic and maintains that athleticism in general ways as well as specific ways inherent to powerlifting.
Functions of G.P.P.: 1)”The formation, strengthening, or restoration of the skills which play an auxiliary role in sport perfection”. 2)”As a means of educating abilities, developed insufficiently by one’s sport which preserves or raises the general work capacity”. As active rest, assisting the restoration processes after significant specific loading and counteracting the monotony of one’s training”.
General Preparatory Exercises for weightlifters/powerlifters: Acceleration runs of 400-1000 meters, jumping exercises, track and field exercises (shot put, hammer, etc.), kettle bell exercises, strongman exercises, gymnastics, acrobatics, sport games (basketball, soccer, football, etc.), cycling, mountain biking, rowing, swimming, hiking, skiing, etc. The objective is to be active and athletic and hone skills that powerlifting does not touch.
|
|
|
Post by erictalmant on Dec 20, 2008 9:37:36 GMT -5
Here's a question for Dave or Eric about the supplemental/developmental thing... The developmental movements are the ones that can be chosen to be used at the end of the workout, with lighter weights, right? This seems clear as they are prescribed often in the programs (e.g. GM's or lunges). So when are the supplemental ones used? It seems that they are also in the programs, often in the 'main body' of work, e.g. pulls to knees, then full pulls. Is it the case that these supplemental SPP movements would be subbed in the programs to suit a lifters needs or weaknesses? e.g. the program as written has a lifter doing full pulls, then bench, then pulls from blocks. Lets say a lifter is great at lockout but weak off the floor. Would defecit pulls be subbed for pulls from blocks (both supplemental SPP movements)?? Yes, the developmental exercises (described above) use lighter loads. However, good mornings would be considered supplemental SPP for the squat and deadlift. I think my post above will also clarify the other part of your question. At some point, if a lifter is absolutely and positively certain that they are stronger in one area and weaker in another then substitutions such as the one you suggested above can certainly be made. The reason why Dave suggests to just do the programs as written for 1-2 cycles (I say much longer) is because you may not necessarily be muscularly weak so much as you are not that neurologically efficient. Your body may not know the movement as well as you *think* it does. It takes a good 2-4 years to perfect skill in movement. Has anyone on here done this? Can anyone on here say that their movement patterns are excellent? Walk before you decide to run.
|
|
spsfw
Full Member
Posts: 165
|
Post by spsfw on Dec 20, 2008 18:18:17 GMT -5
great post Eric
|
|
|
Post by benburgess on Dec 21, 2008 9:46:22 GMT -5
Yep, some great info there Eric. At some point, if a lifter is absolutely and positively certain that they are stronger in one area and weaker in another then substitutions such as the one you suggested above can certainly be made. Would you say, then, that this could be extended to not only where lifters are weak, but what they require from their training? e.g. a shirted bencher requires strong triceps for the lockout. Lets say the cycle they are following has them raw benching twice in the same session. It seems to me that switching the 2nd bench movement for one of the supplemetal SPP movements that hits the lockout harder (e.g. bench with chains) would be sensible. The reason why Dave suggests to just do the programs as written for 1-2 cycles (I say much longer) is because you may not necessarily be muscularly weak so much as you are not that neurologically efficient. Your body may not know the movement as well as you *think* it does. This is gold. Is there a way of determining between muscular weakness and neurological inefficiency then?
|
|
|
Post by erictalmant on Dec 21, 2008 18:14:12 GMT -5
Yep, some great info there Eric. At some point, if a lifter is absolutely and positively certain that they are stronger in one area and weaker in another then substitutions such as the one you suggested above can certainly be made. Would you say, then, that this could be extended to not only where lifters are weak, but what they require from their training? e.g. a shirted bencher requires strong triceps for the lockout. Lets say the cycle they are following has them raw benching twice in the same session. It seems to me that switching the 2nd bench movement for one of the supplemetal SPP movements that hits the lockout harder (e.g. bench with chains) would be sensible. The reason why Dave suggests to just do the programs as written for 1-2 cycles (I say much longer) is because you may not necessarily be muscularly weak so much as you are not that neurologically efficient. Your body may not know the movement as well as you *think* it does. This is gold. Is there a way of determining between muscular weakness and neurological inefficiency then?To your first point: yes. However, if you want a strong lockout for shirt benching then overloading the top with just straight weight for board presses, etc. is the way to go in my opinion over chains and bands. To your second point: this is tough to quantify because it varies from lifter to lifter. Let me think on this one because it might be more than just a lifter's classification. I will need to go back and review my notes.
|
|
|
Post by benburgess on Dec 22, 2008 12:41:52 GMT -5
To your first point: yes. However, if you want a strong lockout for shirt benching then overloading the top with just straight weight for board presses, etc. is the way to go in my opinion over chains and bands. To your second point: this is tough to quantify because it varies from lifter to lifter. Let me think on this one because it might be more than just a lifter's classification. I will need to go back and review my notes. 1. Cool, I happen to agree as it goes. I just used bench with chains as an example as it is one of the few movements in the Bench Supplemental list that does overload the top end. 2. Again, cool, and take your time. I'm just curious although not bi-curious. I guess it would be useful to know though.
|
|
|
Post by erictalmant on Dec 23, 2008 18:08:00 GMT -5
To your first point: yes. However, if you want a strong lockout for shirt benching then overloading the top with just straight weight for board presses, etc. is the way to go in my opinion over chains and bands. To your second point: this is tough to quantify because it varies from lifter to lifter. Let me think on this one because it might be more than just a lifter's classification. I will need to go back and review my notes. 1. Cool, I happen to agree as it goes. I just used bench with chains as an example as it is one of the few movements in the Bench Supplemental list that does overload the top end. 2. Again, cool, and take your time. I'm just curious although not bi-curious. I guess it would be useful to know though. I just might have something soon that would allow one to perhaps quantify their degree of neurological efficiency. I will post it up here when I believe it is finished.
|
|
|
Post by robwhite on Jan 27, 2009 7:17:05 GMT -5
Does anyone have any idea what kind of loads i should be using for the good morning, as a % of either the squat or deadlift?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2009 12:04:38 GMT -5
[To your first point: yes. However, if you want a strong lockout for shirt benching then overloading the top with just straight weight for board presses, etc. is the way to go in my opinion over chains and bands.
Eric Why do you feel boards are better than using chains, curious for your reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by davebates on Jan 27, 2009 14:16:55 GMT -5
Does anyone have any idea what kind of loads i should be using for the good morning, as a % of either the squat or deadlift? Yes, it's up to 40% of your current squat max
|
|
|
Post by robwhite on Jan 28, 2009 4:47:31 GMT -5
Great, cheers Dave.
In terms of the other SPP Accessory work, i I know Eric gave 10% of his bench as an approximate load for the DB flyes, and i'm using a recommendation by Christian Thibaudeau for the lunges which is 40% of the squat.
Any recommenations for dips? I'm currently doing them with a 10kg plate strappd to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2009 12:42:16 GMT -5
great list. I can tell other posters that I have had wonderful success with front squating as my SPP squat.
Dave, I noticed there is no Rev Band Bench on the list. I was wondering if it was an oversight or deliberate abscence. If an oversight, what are your thoughts. I've seen some info written on it, but nothing clear in terms of numbers, band anchor heights (and so forth). I suppose the reason for this is there are to many variables (arm length, grip, band selection).
|
|
|
Post by davebates on Jan 29, 2009 13:46:54 GMT -5
Great, cheers Dave. In terms of the other SPP Accessory work, i I know Eric gave 10% of his bench as an approximate load for the DB flyes, and i'm using a recommendation by Christian Thibaudeau for the lunges which is 40% of the squat. Any recommenations for dips? I'm currently doing them with a 10kg plate strappd to me. not % wise. I would say as long as it does not affect your main training sessions, you should be fine with whatever weight you decide to use.
|
|
|
Post by davebates on Jan 29, 2009 13:55:11 GMT -5
great list. I can tell other posters that I have had wonderful success with front squating as my SPP squat. Dave, I noticed there is no Rev Band Bench on the list. I was wondering if it was an oversight or deliberate abscence. If an oversight, what are your thoughts. I've seen some info written on it, but nothing clear in terms of numbers, band anchor heights (and so forth). I suppose the reason for this is there are to many variables (arm length, grip, band selection). I don't think Boris worked with bands. It opens a whole new area to explore to see what works and what does not.
|
|